Compare Chevrolet Tahoe 5 vs Chrysler Aspen vs Toyota Sequoia

Variants
3.0 Duramax
3.0 Duramax AWD
5.3
5.3 AWD
6.2
6.2 AWD
4.7 4WD
4.7
4.7 FlexFuel 4WD
4.7 FlexFuel
5.7 335 4WD
5.7 335
5.7 376 4WD
5.7 376
5.7 Hybrid 4WD
4.7 AWD
4.7 RWD
4.7 VVT-i AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
722 L / 25.5 cu-ft ~ 3479 L / 122.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
102.0 L / 26.9 gal
99.0 L / 26.2 gal
Passengers
7
8
5
Payload
650 kg / 1433 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 336x28 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc, 352x22 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link, Solid axle
Solid axle
Solid axle
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1927 mm / 75.9 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Size | Length
5351 mm / 210.7 in
5180 mm / 203.9 in
Size | Width
2058 mm / 81.0 in
1980 mm / 78.0 in
Track Width | Front
1741.0 mm / 68.5 in
1637.0 mm / 64.4 in
1675.0 mm / 65.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1734.0 mm / 68.3 in
1680.0 mm / 66.1 in
Weight
2300.0 kg / 5070.6 lbs
Wheelbase
3071 mm / 120.9 in
3027 mm / 119.2 in
3000 mm / 118.1 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
12.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
12.2 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.391
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
175.0 km/h / 108.7 mph

Powertrain

Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
4.7 L / 284.6 cu-in / 4664.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
52.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
427 Nm / 314.9 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm
Transmission | Gears
10-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
87%
65%
76%
Pros
  • Good engine lineup
  • Imposing styling
  • Great offroad capabilities
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • High cargo capacity
  • Powerful engines
  • Solid on-road performance
  • Superb drivetrain reliability
  • Very high cargo capacity
Cons
  • Build quality average
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • High 0.39 drag coefficient
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Worse offroad capabilities than the Land Cruiser
  • Bland styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.