Compare Chevrolet Trailblazer 3 vs Chevrolet Equinox vs Chevrolet Equinox 2
Variants
1.2 CVT
1.3 AWD AT
1.3 CVT
ACTIV 1.3 AWD AT
ACTIV 1.3 CVT
RS 1.3 AWD AT
RS 1.3 CVT
FWD
AWD
2.4 Euro6
2.4 Euro6 AWD
2.4
2.4 AWD
3.0
3.0 AWD
3.6
3.6 AWD
3.6 Euro6
3.6 Euro6 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
716 L / 25.3 cu-ft ~ 1540 L / 54.4 cu-ft
860 L / 30.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.9 L / 10.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.8 L / 4.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link, Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R16
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Size | Length
4795 mm / 188.8 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
Size | Width
1808 mm / 71.2 in
1835 mm / 72.2 in
Track Width | Front
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2860 mm / 112.6 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
495 kg / 1091 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine
LNJ
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.4 L / 204.4 cu-in / 3350.0 cc
Engine | Power
185.0 hp / 138.0 kW @ 5200 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
55.2 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
285 Nm / 210.2 lb-ft @ 3800 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-3 DOHC engine
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Production
Availability
2020
2005 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
7%
18%
37%
Pros
- Easy to park
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Much improved exterior styling
- Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Ugly
- Crossover nonsense
- Basic suspension setup
- Very ugly indeed
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Falsely marketed as SUV
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.