Compare Land Rover Range Rover Velar (L560) facelift vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs BMW X3 G01 LCI

Land Rover Range Rover Velar (L560) facelift

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

BMW X3 G01 LCI

Land Rover Range Rover Velar (L560) faceliftLand Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)BMW X3 G01 LCI
Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
20d
20i
30d
30e
30i
M40d
M40i

Reviews

Neofiliac score67%27%57%
Pros
  • Some interesting engine options
  • More reliable than the bigger RRs
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent performance
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Tiny engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.