Compare Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs Ford Explorer 6 (U625) vs Ford Kuga 2 / Escape 3 (C520)

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

Ford Explorer 6 (U625)

Ford Kuga 2 / Escape 3 (C520)

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)Ford Explorer 6 (U625)Ford Kuga 2 / Escape 3 (C520)
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
2.3 EcoBoost 300
2.3 EcoBoost 300 AWD
3.0 EcoBoost 457 PHEV AWD
3.3 Cyclone 322 Hybrid
3.0 EcoBoost 365 AWD
ST 3.0 EcoBoost 400 AWD
1.5 120
1.5 150
1.5 182 4x4 AT
1.5 TDCI 120
1.5 TDCI 120 AT
1.6 150
1.6 150 4x4 AT
1.6 182 4x4 AT
2.0 242 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 4x4
2.0 TDCi 140 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCI 150
2.0 TDCI 150 4x4
2.0 TDCI 150 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCi 163 4x4
2.0 TDCi 163 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCI 180 4x4
2.0 TDCI 180 4x4 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score27%69%19%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Athletic styling
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Uglier than the original
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.