Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Nissan X-Trail vs Nissan Rogue 2
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
2.0
2.0 AWD
2.0 Euro4 AWD
2.0 AWD AT
2.2 dCi 114 AWD
2.2 dCi 136
2.2 dCi 136 AWD
2.5 AWD
2.5 AWD AT
2.0 AWD Hybrid CVT
2.0 Hybrid CVT
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1841 L / 65.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
18.6 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1675 mm / 65.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1839 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2625 mm / 103.3 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
29%
37%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Some offroad capabilities
- Improved styling
- Improved interior appointments
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Slow and sluggish
- Uncomfortable
- No powerful engine options
- Poor fit and finish
- No powerful engine options
- Bad engine reputation
- Unreliable CVTs
- Poor handling
- MacPherson front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.