Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Kia Sportage 3 vs Kia Soul
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.6
1.7D 116
2.0 163
2.0 163 AT
2.0D 136
2.0D 136 AWD AT
2.0D 136 AT
2.0D 184
2.0D 184 AWD
2.0D 184 AWD AT
2.0D 184 AT
2.0 GDI
2.0 GDI AWD
2.0 GDI AWD AT
2.0 GDI AT
2.4 176 AWD AT
1.6
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft ~ 570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
410 kg / 904 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Breakover Angle
17.7 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
28.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
195/65R15
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.7 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
172 mm / 6.8 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1661 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4440 mm / 174.8 in
4105 mm / 161.6 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
1270.0 kg / 2799.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine
Theta II
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
79.2 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
26%
14%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Marginal offroad capabilities
- Distinct styling
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- Remains ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.