Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Nissan Rogue 2 vs Nissan Rogue
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
2.0 AWD Hybrid CVT
2.0 Hybrid CVT
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT
AWD
AWD 2011+
FWD
FWD 2011+
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
18.6 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
215/70 R16, 225/60 R17, 225/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
211 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Size | Width
1839 mm / 72.4 in
1801 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17, 7.0J x 18
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.3 sec
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Engine
QR25DE
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
237 Nm / 174.8 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
CVT
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
37%
25%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Improved styling
- Improved interior appointments
- Better appointed than the Qashqai
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Bad engine reputation
- Unreliable CVTs
- Poor handling
- MacPherson front suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.