Compare Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs Volvo XC60 II (SPA) vs Ford Escape 4 / Kuga 3

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)

Ford Escape 4 / Kuga 3

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Ford Escape 4 / Kuga 3
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 120
1.5 EcoBoost 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.5 Duratec 190 AWD CVT
2.5 Duratec 225 PHEV CVT

Reviews

Neofiliac score27%57%17%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Cheap to purchase
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Crossover nonsense
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.