Compare BMW X2 F39 vs Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60) vs Toyota C-HR facelift

BMW X2 F39

Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)

Toyota C-HR facelift

BMW X2 F39Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
sDrive18d
sDrive18d AT
xDrive18d
xDrive18d AT
sDrive18i
sDrive18i AT
sDrive20d AT
xDrive20d AT
sDrive20i AT
sDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive20i AT
xDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25e AT
M35i AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score34%42%42%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good build quality
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Ugly styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Small engines
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.