Compare BMW X2 F39 vs Nissan Juke (F15) vs Nissan Murano 3 (Z52)

BMW X2 F39

Nissan Juke (F15)

Nissan Murano 3 (Z52)

BMW X2 F39Nissan Juke (F15)Nissan Murano 3 (Z52)
Variants
sDrive18d
sDrive18d AT
xDrive18d
xDrive18d AT
sDrive18i
sDrive18i AT
sDrive20d AT
xDrive20d AT
sDrive20i AT
sDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive20i AT
xDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25e AT
M35i AT
1.2 DIG-T
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro6
1.5 dCi Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT
1.6 117PS
1.6 117PS CVT
1.6 94PS Euro6
1.6 94PS
1.6 DIG-T
1.6 DIG-T CVT
1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT
Nismo
Nismo AWD CVT
Nismo RS AWD CVT
Nismo RS
2.5 Hybrid AWD
3.5
3.5 AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score34%6%24%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • So ugly it's endearing
  • Cheap to purchase
Cons
  • Ugly styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible Renault engines
  • Bad CVT
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Poor CVT
  • Low build quality

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.