Compare BMW X2 F39 vs Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace 2 facelift vs Volvo XC60 (Y20)

BMW X2 F39

Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace 2 facelift

Volvo XC60 (Y20)

BMW X2 F39Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace 2 faceliftVolvo XC60 (Y20)
Variants
sDrive18d
sDrive18d AT
xDrive18d
xDrive18d AT
sDrive18i
sDrive18i AT
sDrive20d AT
xDrive20d AT
sDrive20i AT
sDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive20i AT
xDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25e AT
M35i AT
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 245 4MOTION DSG
2.4D
2.4D AWD
2.4D AWD AT
3.2 238PS AWD
3.2 243PS AWD
D3 AT
D3 AWD
D3 AWD AT
D5 185PS AWD
D5 185PS AWD AT
D5 205PS AWD
D5 205PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AWD
DRIVe
T5 240
T6 285PS AWD
T6 285PS AWD AT
T6 304PS AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score34%39%33%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Interesting I5 and I6 engines
  • OK-looking for a crossover
  • Good fit and finish
Cons
  • Ugly styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bland and uninspiring
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.