Compare Mazda CX-3 (DK) vs Mazda CX-9 (TB) vs Mazda CX-5 II (KF)

Mazda CX-3 (DK)

Mazda CX-9 (TB)

Mazda CX-5 II (KF)

Mazda CX-3 (DK)Mazda CX-9 (TB)Mazda CX-5 II (KF)
Variants
1.5d
1.5d 4WD
1.5d AWD AT
1.8 Skyactiv-D
1.8 Skyactiv-D AWD
1.8 Skyactiv-D AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 121
2.0 Skyactiv-G 121 AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 148 AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 150 AWD
2.0 Skyactiv-G 150 AWD AT
2.0i
2.0i AT
3.5 AWD
3.7
3.7 2010+
3.7 2013+
3.7 AWD 2013+
3.7 AWD 2010+
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G AT
2.0 SKYACTIV-G AWD
2.0 SKYACTIV-G AWD AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 AWD
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 AWD AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184 AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184 AWD
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184 AWD AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G 187 AWD AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G 194 AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G 194 AWD AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score23%65%40%
Pros
  • Decent engine reliability
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Good engine lineup
  • Decent build quality
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.