Compare Renault Koleos II facelift vs BMW X1 F48 LCI vs Renault Captur 2
Variants
1.7 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 190 AWD
sDrive16d
sDrive16d AT
sDrive18d
sDrive18d AT
xDrive18d
xDrive18d AT
sDrive18i
sDrive18i AT
sDrive20d AT
xDrive20d AT
sDrive20i AT
xDrive20i AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25e AT
xDrive25i AT
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 91
1.3 TCe 130 DCT
1.3 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 154 AT
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 AT
1.5 dCi 95
E-TECH 143
E-TECH 160
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
498 L / 17.6 cu-ft ~ 1706 L / 60.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.9 L / 8.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 292 mm
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
24.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
225/65 R17 102H, 225/60 R18 100H, 225/55 R19 99V
225/55 R17 97W
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
10.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
189 mm / 7.4 in
Size | Height
1667 mm / 65.6 in
1598 mm / 62.9 in
Size | Length
4673 mm / 184.0 in
4447 mm / 175.1 in
4227 mm / 166.4 in
Size | Width
1813 mm / 71.4 in | 2063 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
1561.0 mm / 61.5 in
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in
7.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2705 mm / 106.5 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2639 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Electric Range
57.0 km / 35.4 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Engine | Type
Turbocharged commonrail diesel inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
X-Tronic
Production
Availability
2019
2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
36%
3%
Pros
- Decent engine reliability
- Some offroad capabilities
- Looks like the original X1
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- FWD-based
- No powerful engine options
- Crossover nonsense
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very ugly
- Poor build quality
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.