HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Citroen C5 Aircross vs Citroen C4 Cactus vs Citroen C5 Aircross

Variants
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.2 e-THP 110PS
1.2 PureTech 110PS AT
1.2 PureTech 75PS
1.2 PureTech 82PS
1.2 PureTech 82PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS AT
1.6 e-HDI 92PS AT
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
348 L / 12.3 cu-ft ~ 1170 L / 41.3 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.0 deg
20.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
27.0 deg
27.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.2 kWh (gross)
13.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Platform
PSA PF1

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
230 mm / 9.1 in
230 mm / 9.1 in
Size | Height
1490 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4157 mm / 163.7 in
Size | Width
1729 mm / 68.1 in | 1946 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2730 mm / 107.5 in
2595 mm / 102.2 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
50.0 km / 31.1 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
11.0:1
10.5:1

Production

Availability
2014 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
15%
3%
15%
Pros
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor performance
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.