Compare Citroen C3 Aircross facelift vs Peugeot 2008 II vs Citroen C4 III
Variants
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 110
1.5 BlueHDi (120 Hp) Automatic
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 HDi 110
1.5 HDi 130 AT
e-C4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1289 L / 45.5 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1250 L / 44.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
195/60 R16, 205/60 R16, 215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1637 mm / 64.4 in
1550 mm / 61.0 in
Size | Length
4160 mm / 163.8 in
4300 mm / 169.3 in
Size | Width
1756 mm / 69.1 in | 1976 mm / 77.8 in (mirror unfolded) | 1824 mm / 71.8 in (mirror folded)
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
1800 mm / 70.9 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1834 mm / 72.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2604 mm / 102.5 in
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
18%
21%
15%
Pros
- Decent engine reliability
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Poor performance
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Very basic chassis design
- Poor performance
- Low build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Horrible performance
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Crossover nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.