HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 5008 II facelift vs Peugeot 2008 vs Kia Soul

Variants
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi
1.6
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
702 L / 24.8 cu-ft ~ 2150 L / 75.9 cu-ft
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft ~ 570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
Passengers
7
5
5
Payload
410 kg / 904 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
195/65R15
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
236 mm / 9.3 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1646 mm / 64.8 in
1556 mm / 61.3 in
1661 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4641 mm / 182.7 in
4159 mm / 163.7 in
4105 mm / 161.6 in
Size | Width
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1739 mm / 68.5 in
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1601.0 mm / 63.0 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
1270.0 kg / 2799.9 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2537 mm / 99.9 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
79.2 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
90.5 mm / 3.6 in

Production

Availability
2020
2009 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
2%
14%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • High cargo capacity
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to fix
  • Distinct styling
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.