Compare Peugeot 2008 II (P24) vs Mazda MX-30 (DR) vs Mazda CX-8 (KG)

Peugeot 2008 II (P24)

Mazda MX-30 (DR)

Mazda CX-8 (KG)

Peugeot 2008 II (P24)Mazda MX-30 (DR)Mazda CX-8 (KG)
Variants
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
2.2d 4WD
2.2d
2.5
2.5T 4WD
2.5T

Reviews

Neofiliac score21%4%32%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Pay less tax
  • Good reliability
  • Good interior space
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible hunchback crossover styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • BEV nonsense
  • Rudimentary suspension setup
  • Bland styling
  • Not built for drivers
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.