Compare Subaru Ascent vs Subaru Forester 2 vs Subaru Outback 4

Variants
2.0X
2.0X AT
2.0XT
2.0XT AT
2.5 158PS
2.5 158PS AT
2.5 165PS
2.5 165PS AT
2.5 173PS
2.5 173PS AT
2.5T
2.0d
2.0d CVT
2.5
2.5 AT
3.6R
Limited 2.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
555 L / 19.6 cu-ft
406 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1525 L / 53.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.1 L / 11.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
73.0 L / 19.3 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs
426 kg / 939 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.6 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
21.8 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
245/60 R18 105H, 245/50 R20 102H
225/60 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
221 mm / 8.7 in
200 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1819 mm / 71.6 in
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Size | Length
4999 mm / 196.8 in
4450 mm / 175.2 in
Size | Width
1930 mm / 76.0 in | 2187 mm / 86.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 2177 mm / 85.7 in (mirror folded)
1735 mm / 68.3 in
1820 mm / 71.7 in
Track Width | Front
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1631.0 mm / 64.2 in
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Weight
2009.0 kg / 4429.1 lbs
Wheel Size
7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2891 mm / 113.8 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in

Performance

Fuel Economy
11.2 L/100km / 21.0 MPG (urban) | 8.7 L/100km / 27.0 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine
FA24
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 145.7 cu-in / 2387.0 cc
Engine | Power
260.0 hp / 193.9 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
108.9 hp/L / 1.8 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
376 Nm / 277.3 lb-ft @ 2000-4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol flat-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
CVT

Production

Availability
2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
31%
34%
41%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Characterful engine
  • Characteristic H4 engiens
  • Symmetric AWD
  • Good cargo capacity
  • Not as ugly as before
Cons
  • CVT
  • Crossover nonsense
  • No powerful engine options
  • MacPherson front suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Outdated automatic transmission
  • CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.