Compare Volvo XC40 vs Peugeot 2008 II (P24) vs Peugeot 2008 (A94)

Volvo XC40

Peugeot 2008 II (P24)

Peugeot 2008 (A94)

Volvo XC40Peugeot 2008 II (P24)Peugeot 2008 (A94)
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%21%2%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to fix
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.