Compare Volvo XC40 vs Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50) vs Toyota Harrier 4 / Venza 2 (XU80)

Volvo XC40

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)

Toyota Harrier 4 / Venza 2 (XU80)

Volvo XC40Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)Toyota Harrier 4 / Venza 2 (XU80)
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%28%29%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Just a clumsy hatchback
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.