Compare Volvo XC40 vs Volvo XC90 vs GMC Terrain
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
D3 AT
D3 AWD AT
2.5T AWD
2.5T AWD AT
T6 AWD
3.2 AWD
2.4
2.4 AWD
3.0
3.0 AWD
3.6
3.6 AWD
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Trailing arm
Turning Circle
12.7 m / 41.7 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
175 mm / 6.9 in
Size | Height
1684 mm / 66.3 in
Size | Width
1849 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Wheelbase
2858 mm / 112.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
38%
52%
Pros
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Good exterior styling
- Imposing styling
- Relatively reliable drivetrain
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Pretends to be "SUV"
- Not SUV but sold as such
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.