Compare Volvo XC40 vs Mercedes-Benz EQA H243 vs Mercedes-Benz GLA H247

Volvo XC40

Mercedes-Benz EQA H243

Mercedes-Benz GLA H247

Volvo XC40Mercedes-Benz EQA H243Mercedes-Benz GLA H247
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
EQA 250
EQA 300 4MATIC
EQA 350 4MATIC+
AMG GLA 35 4MATIC
AMG GLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG GLA 45 S 4MATIC+
GLA 180
GLA 180d
GLA 200
GLA 200 4MATIC
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC
GLA 220d
GLA 220d 4MATIC
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC
GLA 250e

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%26%32%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Up to 426km electric range
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent interior quality
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bland and ugly
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.