Compare Volvo XC40 vs Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Volvo XC40

Mercedes-Benz EQC N293

Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Volvo XC40Mercedes-Benz EQC N293Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%28%60%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Up to 436km electric range
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Great V8 in the 63AMG models
  • Cleaner exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • BEV nonsense
  • Greenwashing
  • Most engines are lethargic
  • Fuel-cell not widely available

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.