Compare Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253 vs Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class X204

Jaguar F-Pace facelift

Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class X204

Jaguar F-Pace faceliftMercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class X204
Variants
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
GLK 200
GLK 200 CDI
GLK 200 CDI AT
GLK 220 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 220 CDI
GLK 220 CDI AT
GLK 250 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 250 4MATIC AT
GLK 280 4MATIC AT
GLK 320 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 CDI Euro5 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 4MATIC AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score68%60%45%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Great V8 in the 63AMG models
  • Cleaner exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Mid-size crossover nonsense
  • Most engines are lethargic
  • Fuel-cell not widely available
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Lethargic drivetrain

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.