Compare Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Jaguar F-Pace facelift

Mercedes-Benz EQC N293

Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Jaguar F-Pace faceliftMercedes-Benz EQC N293Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253
Variants
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score68%28%60%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Up to 436km electric range
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Great V8 in the 63AMG models
  • Cleaner exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Mid-size crossover nonsense
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • BEV nonsense
  • Greenwashing
  • Most engines are lethargic
  • Fuel-cell not widely available

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.