Compare Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Toyota Highlander 3 (XU50) vs Toyota Venza (AV10)

Jaguar E-Pace facelift

Toyota Highlander 3 (XU50)

Toyota Venza (AV10)

Jaguar E-Pace faceliftToyota Highlander 3 (XU50)Toyota Venza (AV10)
Variants
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
2.7 AT
3.5 249 AWD 8AT
3.5 249 AWD 6AT
3.5 296 AWD 8AT
3.5 296 8AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
2.7
2.7 AT
2.7 AWD
2.7 AWD AT
3.5
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD
3.5 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score35%78%24%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Superb styling
  • Wonderful reliability record
  • Great build quality
  • Marginal offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Rather good exterior design (for what it is)
  • Exceptionally reliable powertrain
  • Great fit and finish
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Half crossover, half station wagon

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.