Compare Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Subaru Forester 5 vs Subaru Crosstrek
Variants
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
2.0 e-Boxer
2.5
1.6 CVT
1.6 MT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0D
2.0DL
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
601 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
1270 L / 44.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
22.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/55 R17
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.1 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1648 mm / 64.9 in
1730 mm / 68.1 in
Size | Length
4395 mm / 173.0 in
4625 mm / 182.1 in
4450 mm / 175.2 in
Size | Width
1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror folded)
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Weight
1655.0 kg / 3648.7 lbs
Wheel Size
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2635 mm / 103.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.2 sec
CO2 Emission
154 g/km
Electric Range
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
Fuel Economy
7.1 L/100km / 33.1 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
117.0 km/h / 72.7 mph
Towing Capacity
1870 kg / 4123 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Type
CVT
Manual
Production
Availability
2020
2018
2012 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
32%
33%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Still available with naturally-aspirated H4 engines
- Fully independent suspension setup
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- No manual transmission
- MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.