Compare Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Audi Q3 Sportback F3 vs Audi RS Q3

Variants
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
310 PS
340 PS
performance

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
601 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
356 L / 12.6 cu-ft ~ 1261 L / 44.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
22.0 deg
20.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
17.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.1 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.0 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1648 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4395 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror folded)
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2603 mm / 102.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Electric Range
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
61.0 km / 37.9 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed

Production

Availability
2020
Debut
2018-07-25
Made In
Hungary, China

Reviews

Neofiliac score
35%
32%
59%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good marketing
  • Interesting I5 engine
  • Imposing styling for its size
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality
  • Impractical and ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.