Compare Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Mazda CX-30 (DM) vs Mazda CX-9 II (TC)

Jaguar E-Pace facelift

Mazda CX-30 (DM)

Mazda CX-9 II (TC)

Jaguar E-Pace faceliftMazda CX-30 (DM)Mazda CX-9 II (TC)
Variants
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
1.8 Skyactiv-D
1.8 Skyactiv-D AT
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 e-Skyactiv X AT
2.0 e-Skyactiv X AWD
2.0 e-Skyactiv X AWD AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G
2.0 Skyactiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G AWD
2.0 Skyactiv-G AWD AT
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 Skyactiv-X AT
2.0 Skyactiv-X AWD
2.0 Skyactiv-X AWD AT
2.5 Skyactiv-G AT
AWD
FWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score35%54%37%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Interesting engine lineup
  • Compression-ignition Skyactiv-X engine
  • Decent styling
  • Good styling
  • Rather good engine
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.