Compare Ford C-MAX 2 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 4
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 ECOnetic 105
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105
1.6 Duratec 125
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 TDCi 95
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6
1.6 120
1.6 85
2.0 188 PHEV
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 170 AT
Pacifica Hybrid
Pacifica
2.4
2.4 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3
3.3 AWD
3.8
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
915 L / 32.3 cu-ft ~ 3979 L / 140.5 cu-ft
920 L / 32.5 cu-ft ~ 4130 L / 145.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 245/50 R20
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1777 mm / 70.0 in
Size | Length
5176 mm / 203.8 in
Size | Width
2022 mm / 79.6 in | 2297 mm / 90.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1997 mm / 78.6 in
Track Width | Front
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
16 in
Wheelbase
2649 mm / 104.3 in
3089 mm / 121.6 in
3030 mm / 119.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
1633 kg / 3600 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 220.0 cu-in / 3605.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
355 Nm / 261.8 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Production
Availability
2016
2001 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
23%
56%
26%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good styling
- Very high cargo capacity
- Large interior space
- Very comfortable
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
Cons
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.