HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Mazda 5 facelift vs Ford Galaxy 2

Variants
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
1.8 TDCi 101
1.8 TDCi 125
2.0 AT
2.0
2.0 TDCi 130
2.0 TDCi 140
2.2 TDCi 175
2.3

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
308 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 2325 L / 82.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
7
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1723 mm / 67.8 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
4820 mm / 189.8 in
Size | Width
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1589.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in

Production

Availability
2008 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
38%
47%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved exterior design
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good automatic transmission
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.