HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Chrysler Voyager 4 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 5

Variants
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
2.4 147
2.4 147 AT
2.4 152
2.4 152 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3 AT
3.3 AWD AT
3.8
3.8 AWD
2.4
2.8D 150
2.8D 163 AT
3.3
3.8 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 4080 L / 144.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
7
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1750 mm / 68.9 in
Size | Length
4805 mm / 189.2 in
Size | Width
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2880 mm / 113.4 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
27%
30%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Lots of interior space
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Lots of interior space
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No in dependent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.