HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Dodge Grand Caravan 4 vs Chrysler Voyager 4

Variants
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
3.3
3.3 AWD
3.5
3.5 AWD
3.8 208
3.8 218
3.8 218 AWD
2.4 147
2.4 147 AT
2.4 152
2.4 152 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3 AT
3.3 AWD AT
3.8
3.8 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
580 L / 20.5 cu-ft ~ 4680 L / 165.3 cu-ft
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 4080 L / 144.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Macpherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Rigid axle
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1750 mm / 68.9 in
1750 mm / 68.9 in
Size | Length
5093 mm / 200.5 in
4805 mm / 189.2 in
Size | Width
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
1995 mm / 78.5 in
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
3030 mm / 119.3 in
2880 mm / 113.4 in

Performance

Top Speed
177.0 km/h / 110.0 mph

Powertrain

Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Redline
5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2000 ~ 2007

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
36%
27%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Lots of space inside
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Lots of interior space
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Ugly
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No in dependent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.