HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Scenic 4 vs Renault Grand Modus vs Mercedes B-class W246 facelift

Variants
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 160 AT
1.7 dCi 120
1.7 dCi 120 AT
1.7 dCi 150
1.7 dCi 150 AT
1.2
1.2 TCe
1.5 dCi 103 AT
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86 5MT
1.5 dCi 86 6MT
1.6 AT
B 160
B 160 DCT
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI
B 180 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 CDI DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 Natural Gas Drive
B 200 Natural Gas Drive DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
305 L / 10.8 cu-ft ~ 1454 L / 51.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
98 mm / 3.9 in
Size | Height
1653 mm / 65.1 in
1589 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4406 mm / 173.5 in
4034 mm / 158.8 in
Size | Width
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2128 mm / 83.8 in (mirror unfolded)
1709 mm / 67.3 in | 1960 mm / 77.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
Wheel Size
20 in
Wheelbase
2734 mm / 107.6 in
2575 mm / 101.4 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
3%
25%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Low build quality
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • 4MATIC nonsense
  • Half-hearted product

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.