Compare Renault Scenic 4 vs Citroen C3 Picasso vs Renault Modus

Variants
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 160 AT
1.7 dCi 120
1.7 dCi 120 AT
1.7 dCi 150
1.7 dCi 150 AT
1.4 VTi
1.4 VTi Euro5
1.4 VTi LPG
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 112PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 VTi 115PS
1.6 VTi 120PS
1.2 TCe
1.2
1.4
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 88

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1653 mm / 65.1 in
1669 mm / 65.7 in
1589 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4406 mm / 173.5 in
4078 mm / 160.6 in
Size | Width
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2128 mm / 83.8 in (mirror unfolded)
1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
Wheel Size
20 in
Wheelbase
2734 mm / 107.6 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2482 mm / 97.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.308

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
2%
6%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Easy to fix
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Low build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • Rather bad design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.