Compare Citroen C4 Grand SpaceTourer vs Citroen C3 Picasso vs Mercedes B-Class W246
Variants
1.2 PureTech 131
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 131
1.5 BlueHDi 131 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 163 AT
1.4 VTi
1.4 VTi Euro5
1.4 VTi LPG
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 112PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 VTi 115PS
1.6 VTi 120PS
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI (OM651)
B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT
B 180 CDI (OM607)
B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft
Passengers
7
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Trailing arm
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1638 mm / 64.5 in
1669 mm / 65.7 in
1557 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4602 mm / 181.2 in
4078 mm / 160.6 in
4359 mm / 171.6 in
Size | Width
1826 mm / 71.9 in | 2117 mm / 83.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1971 mm / 77.6 in (mirror folded)
1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Stroke
90.5 mm / 3.6 in
73.7 mm / 2.9 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
2%
24%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent interior space
- Easy to fix
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
Cons
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor fit and finish
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.