HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Toyota Sienna 4 vs Toyota Alphard 3 vs Toyota Wish

Variants
2.5 Hybrid AWD
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 AWD Hybrid
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD AT
1.8 125 4WD AT
1.8 132 AT
2.0 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
949 L / 33.5 cu-ft ~ 2860 L / 101.0 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 327.66 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 317.5 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/60 R17, 235/50 R18
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.9 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door hybrid Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
155 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Size | Length
5169 mm / 203.5 in
4945 mm / 194.7 in
Size | Width
1994 mm / 78.5 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1740.0 mm / 68.5 in
Weight
2091.0 kg / 4609.9 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
15 in
Wheelbase
3061 mm / 120.5 in
3000 mm / 118.1 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.9 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
10.5 L/100km / 22.4 MPG (combined) | 14.3 L/100km / 16.4 MPG (urban) | 8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
SULEV
Euro 5
Engine
A25A-FXS
Engine | Bore
87.4 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
14.0:1
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2487.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
76.0 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
103.4 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Type
direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
e-CVT

Production

Availability
2020
2003 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
55%
54%
23%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good styling
  • High reliability
  • High comfort
  • Aggressive styling
  • Large interior space
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Good exterior design
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.