Compare Toyota Sienna 4 vs Toyota Alphard vs Toyota Wish 2

Variants
2.5 Hybrid AWD
2.5 Hybrid
2.4
2.4 4WD
3.0 4AT
3.0 4WD
3.0 5AT
1.8 131 4WD
1.8 133 4WD
1.8 143
1.8i 144
2.0 152
2.0 158

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
949 L / 33.5 cu-ft ~ 2860 L / 101.0 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 327.66 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 317.5 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/55 R17
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.9 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door hybrid Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1935 mm / 76.2 in
Size | Length
5169 mm / 203.5 in
Size | Width
1994 mm / 78.5 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1740.0 mm / 68.5 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Weight
2091.0 kg / 4609.9 lbs
Wheelbase
3061 mm / 120.5 in
2900 mm / 114.2 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
10.5 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
12.0 L/100km / 19.6 MPG (combined) | 14.0 L/100km / 16.8 MPG (urban) | 10.0 L/100km / 23.5 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
SULEV
Engine
A25A-FXS
Engine | Bore
87.4 mm / 3.4 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
14.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2487.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
76.0 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
103.4 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Type
direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
e-CVT
Automatic
CVT

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
55%
45%
33%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good styling
  • High reliability
  • Good drivetrain options
  • Lots of space inside
  • Small turning circle
  • Coherent styling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.