Compare Toyota Sienna 4 vs Toyota Ipsum 2 vs Mazda 5
Variants
2.5 Hybrid AWD
2.5 Hybrid
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 D-4D
1.8
2.0
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
949 L / 33.5 cu-ft ~ 2860 L / 101.0 cu-ft
282 L / 10.0 cu-ft ~ 2422 L / 85.5 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 327.66 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 317.5 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.9 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door hybrid Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
150 mm / 5.9 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Size | Length
5169 mm / 203.5 in
4505 mm / 177.4 in
Size | Width
1994 mm / 78.5 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1755 mm / 69.1 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1740.0 mm / 68.5 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Weight
2091.0 kg / 4609.9 lbs
Wheelbase
3061 mm / 120.5 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.29
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
SULEV
Euro 4
Engine
A25A-FXS
Engine | Bore
87.4 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
14.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2487.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
76.0 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
103.4 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Type
direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
e-CVT
Manual
Production
Availability
2020
2001 ~ 2009
2005 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
55%
29%
37%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- High cargo capacity
- Good styling
- High reliability
- High cargo capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good interior seating / cargo space
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uninspiring design
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.