Compare Hyundai ix20 facelift vs Hyundai ix20 vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso

Variants
1.4d 77
1.4d 90
1.4i 90
1.6d 116
1.6d 128
1.6i 125
1.6i 125 AT
1.4 CRDi
1.4
1.6 CRDi
1.6 AT
1.6 HDi 112 AT
1.6 HDi 109 6MT
1.6 HDi 109 5MT
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 140 AT
1.6 150 AT
1.6 156 AT
1.6 120 Euro5
1.6 120
1.8 125
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 140 4AT
2.0 140 6AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft ~ 1486 L / 52.5 cu-ft
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft ~ 1486 L / 52.5 cu-ft
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft ~ 1951 L / 68.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
7
Payload
529 kg / 1166 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
195/65 R15, 205/55 R16, 205/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.2 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1600 mm / 63.0 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
1660 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4115 mm / 162.0 in
4100 mm / 161.4 in
4590 mm / 180.7 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in | 2100 mm / 82.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1551.0 mm / 61.1 in
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2615 mm / 103.0 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in
2728 mm / 107.4 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
115 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Fuel Economy
4.4 L/100km / 53.5 MPG (combined) | 5.1 L/100km / 46.1 MPG (urban) | 4.0 L/100km / 58.8 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
550 kg / 1213 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 5

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
6%
12%
24%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Reasonably reliable engines
  • More interior space than the Picasso
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Rather uglier than the Picasso
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.