Compare BMW 2 Series Active Tourer U06 vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 LCI vs Renault Grand Scenic 4

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer U06

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 LCI

Renault Grand Scenic 4

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer U06BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 LCIRenault Grand Scenic 4
Variants
218d
218i
220i
223i
216d
216d DCT
216i
218d
218d AT
218d xDrive
218d xDrive AT
218i Euro6d
218i Euro6d AT
218i
218i DCT
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i Euro6d AT
220i DCT
225i xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d-TEMP xDrive AT
225xe xDrive AT
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 110 Hybrid
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 160 AT
1.7 dCi 120
1.7 dCi 120 AT
1.7 dCi 150
1.7 dCi 150 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%33%10%
Pros
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside for its size
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.