Compare Chrysler Pacifica 2 vs Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Chrysler Voyager 4
Variants
Pacifica Hybrid
Pacifica
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
2.4 147
2.4 147 AT
2.4 152
2.4 152 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3 AT
3.3 AWD AT
3.8
3.8 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
915 L / 32.3 cu-ft ~ 3979 L / 140.5 cu-ft
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 4080 L / 144.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 245/50 R20
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1777 mm / 70.0 in
1750 mm / 68.9 in
Size | Length
5176 mm / 203.8 in
4805 mm / 189.2 in
Size | Width
2022 mm / 79.6 in | 2297 mm / 90.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
16 in
Wheelbase
3089 mm / 121.6 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2880 mm / 113.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Towing Capacity
1633 kg / 3600 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 220.0 cu-in / 3605.0 cc
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
355 Nm / 261.8 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Production
Availability
2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
56%
24%
27%
Pros
- Good styling
- Very high cargo capacity
- Large interior space
- Very comfortable
- High cargo capacity
- Decent engine reliability
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- No in dependent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.