Compare Chrysler Pacifica 2 vs Mazda 5 facelift vs Ford C-MAX 2

Variants
Pacifica Hybrid
Pacifica
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 ECOnetic 105
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105
1.6 Duratec 125
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 TDCi 95
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6
1.6 120
1.6 85
2.0 188 PHEV
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 170 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
915 L / 32.3 cu-ft ~ 3979 L / 140.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 245/50 R20
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1777 mm / 70.0 in
Size | Length
5176 mm / 203.8 in
4505 mm / 177.4 in
Size | Width
2022 mm / 79.6 in | 2297 mm / 90.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1755 mm / 69.1 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
15 in
Wheelbase
3089 mm / 121.6 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2649 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.29
Towing Capacity
1633 kg / 3600 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 220.0 cu-in / 3605.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
355 Nm / 261.8 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm

Production

Availability
2016
2008 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
56%
38%
23%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Large interior space
  • Very comfortable
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved exterior design
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.