Compare Skoda Octavia 4 (NX) Combi vs Volvo V60 II vs Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4

Skoda Octavia 4 (NX) Combi

Volvo V60 II

Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4

Skoda Octavia 4 (NX) CombiVolvo V60 IIAlfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4
Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.4 PHEV 204 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
RS
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score36%62%28%
Pros
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Really, really ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.