Compare Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Ford Focus 4 Wagon vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon
Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.4 PHEV 204 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
RS
1.0 EcoBoost 100PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 155PS MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 85PS
1.5 EcoBlue 120PS
1.5 EcoBlue 120PS AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS AT
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS
2.0 EcoBlue 150PS
2.0 EcoBlue 150PS AT
Focus ST
Focus ST AT
Focus ST Diesel
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost AT
1.5 TDCi
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi
1.6 TDCi ECOnetic
2.0 EcoBoost 203PS AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AWD
2.0 TDCi 150PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS
2.0 TDCi 180PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 180PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS AWD AT
2.0 TDCi 210PS AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1585 L / 56.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.5 L / 16.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
115 mm / 4.5 in
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1501 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4867 mm / 191.6 in
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1566.0 mm / 61.7 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
36%
50%
32%
Pros
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Focus ST still available
- Improved, cleaner styling
- Better handling characteristics
- Low official fuel consumption
- Improved styling
Cons
- Ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Only available with small engines
- Engines are too small
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.