Compare Volvo V60 II vs Kia Optima Sportswagon vs Kia Carnival 4
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi DCT
1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.7 CRDi DCT
1.7 CRDi
2.0 CVVL
2.0 CVVL Euro6d
2.0 CVVL AT
2.0 CVVL Euro6d AT
2.0 GDI PHEV
2.0 GDI Euro6d PHEV
GT Euro6d AT
GT AT
2.2d 11 Seat
2.2d 7 Seat
2.2d 9 Seat
3.5 11 Seat
3.5 7 Seat
3.5 9 Seat
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Column-Mounted Electric Power steering
Steering Ratio
14.23:1
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.3 kWh (gross) | 9.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
5-door Minivan
Platform
Hyundai-Kia N3
Dimensions
Size | Height
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4855 mm / 191.1 in
5155 mm / 203.0 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2805 mm / 110.4 in
3090 mm / 121.7 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.28
Electric Range
62.0 km / 38.5 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine
G4NG
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2021-02-23
Made In
Korea
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
50%
55%
Pros
- Good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low official fuel consumption
- Rather good-looking
- Good styling
- Large interior space
- Great comfort
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Poor handling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.