HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo V60 II vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports vs Fiat Tipo Wagon

Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.3 Dual VVT-i
1.4 D-4D
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 VVT-i Hybrid
2.0 D-4D
1.3 16V MultiJet II
1.3 16V MultiJet II Euro6d
1.4 16V FIRE
1.4 16V FIRE Euro6d
1.4 16V T-Jet EasyPower
1.4 16V T-Jet EasyPower
1.6 16V E.torQ AT
1.6 16V MultiJet II
1.6 16V MultiJet II DDCT
1.6 16V MultiJet II Euro6d
1.6 16V MultiJet II Euro6d DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 225/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4560 mm / 179.5 in
4571 mm / 180.0 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1792 mm / 70.6 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2638 mm / 103.9 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
CO2 Emission
88 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 5 J
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
62%
28%
24%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good for fuel costs
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.