Compare Volvo V60 II vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S206 vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S205 facelift

Volvo V60 II

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S206

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S205 facelift

Volvo V60 IIMercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S206Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S205 facelift
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
C 200 4MATIC AT
C 200 AT
C 220d 4MATIC AT
C 220d AT
C 300d AT
C 300e AT
C 300 4MATIC AT
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63
AMG C 63 S
C 160
C 180
C 180d
C 200
C 200 4MATIC
C 200d 150PS
C 200d 160PS MT
C 220d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 300
C 300d
C 300d 4MATIC
C 400 4MATIC

Reviews

Neofiliac score62%67%88%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Great styling
  • Good suspension setup
  • Superb M177 V8 in the AMG model
  • Imposing exterior design
  • Great 9G-Tronic transmission
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Only available with small engines
  • 4MATIC and hybrid nonsenses

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.