Compare Volvo V60 II vs Skoda Superb B8 Combi (3V) facelift vs Mazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) facelift

Volvo V60 II

Skoda Superb B8 Combi (3V) facelift

Mazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) facelift

Volvo V60 IISkoda Superb B8 Combi (3V) faceliftMazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) facelift
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 120 DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
PHEV
2.0 Skyactiv-G 145PS
2.0 Skyactiv-G 165PS
2.0 Skyactiv-G 165PS AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS 4x4
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS 4x4 AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS AT
2.5 Skyactiv-G AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score62%39%30%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Handsome styling
  • Great engine lineup
  • 6-speed manual widely available
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • No real improvement over pre-facelift

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.