Compare Volvo V60 II vs Ford Focus 4 Wagon facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon

Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV AT
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
ST
ST AT
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost AT
1.5 TDCi
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi
1.6 TDCi ECOnetic
2.0 EcoBoost 203PS AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AWD
2.0 TDCi 150PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS
2.0 TDCi 180PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 180PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS AWD AT
2.0 TDCi 210PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1585 L / 56.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.5 L / 16.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
118 mm / 4.6 in
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1501 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4867 mm / 191.6 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score
62%
38%
32%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent build quality
  • Not very ugly
  • Independent suspension setup
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Engines are too small
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.